Week 04 — Hedging, softening and concision¶
This week
Grammar: Conditionals and modals for hedging and softening · Vocabulary: Diplomatic and hedging language (conceivably, presumably, provisional, candid, tactful) · Idioms & phrasal verbs: Negotiation: meet halfway, off the table, on the table, sleep on it, drive a hard bargain · Speaking: Cutting filler words (um, like, you know) · Writing: Editing for concision: cut 30 percent · Soft skill: Disagreeing respectfully
Checkpoint comm-1 (this week): on Sunday, review your error log since Week 0, count how many of your top-3 mistakes still appeared this week, and re-score last Saturday's recording against the Week 0 baseline in docs/log/comm-baseline.md. Note any progress and the one area for the next month.
Day 1 — Grammar: Conditionals and modals for hedging and softening¶
⏱ 30 min · Mon
Rule in 60 seconds¶
- Conditionals: zero (if + present, present: general truths); first (if + present, will: real, likely); second (if + past, would: unlikely or hypothetical); third (if + past perfect, would have + participle: unreal past). Would never goes in the if-clause: "If we had more time" (not "would have").
- Second conditional for politeness (distance): past forms make a request less direct. "If you could send the report, I'd be grateful." "I was wondering if you could review this." "Would it be possible to...?"
- Modals of certainty (approximate ladder, strongest to weakest): will > should > may > might > could. "This should fix it" (I expect so) vs "This could fix it" (it's possible). Add adverbs: probably, possibly, conceivably.
- Hedging verbs and phrases: seem, appear, tend to, suggest, indicate; it looks as though; to some extent; in most cases.
- The error fluent speakers make: "If I would have time..." (wrong); "Would you mind to look" (should be looking); over-hedging ("I think maybe perhaps we might possibly...") which sounds unsure; under-hedging in negative feedback ("This is wrong.") which sounds harsh. Hedge once, precisely.
Exercise¶
- Soften: "Send me the report today."
- Soften: "You're wrong about the latency."
- Fix: If we would have more time, we would test more.
- Fix: If the team had more budget, it will hire two engineers.
- Choose: If we had known about the limit, we (would fix / would have fixed) it earlier.
- Make less certain: "This will fix the issue."
- Rewrite politely: "I want to add something."
- Choose: "I was wondering if you (can / could) review my draft."
- Fix: Would you mind to look at this?
- Which expresses the strongest certainty: it may / it should / it might / it could work?
Answers and explanations
- "Could you send me the report today?" / "Would it be possible to get the report today?" 2. "I'm not sure that's quite right; the numbers I have suggest otherwise." (soften and shift to evidence.) 3. "If we had more time, we would test more." 4. "...it would hire..." (second conditional: would in main clause.) 5. would have fixed (third conditional). 6. "This should fix the issue" / "This might fix the issue." 7. "I was wondering if I could add something." 8. could (past form for distance). 9. "Would you mind looking at this?" (mind + gerund.) 10. it should (expectation): may/might/could express possibility only.
Note item 10: the ladder is approximate; context and stress change it.
Use it¶
Write three sentences about your work: a polite request with could, a disagreement with a hedge ("It seems that..."), and a second conditional ("If we had... we would...").
Day 2 — Vocabulary: Diplomatic and hedging language¶
⏱ 30 min · Tue
| Word | Part of speech | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| conceivably | adverb | possibly, in a way that can be imagined but is not certain | Conceivably, the outage could have been avoided with a stricter canary policy. |
| presumably | adverb | it is reasonable to suppose, though not confirmed | Presumably the vendor has tested this against our schema; I'll confirm. |
| provisional | adjective | arranged for now, but likely to change | The launch date is provisional until the security review is complete. |
| candid | adjective | honest and direct, often about something difficult | She gave a candid assessment of the team's readiness. |
| tactful | adjective | careful not to offend, showing sensitivity | A tactful way to raise the issue is to ask about the constraints first. |
Collocations and word family¶
- conceivably / conceivable (it is conceivable that...); inconceivable.
- presumably at the start or before the verb; noun presumption; verb presume ("I presume you have read the RFC").
- provisional agreement / schedule / approval; near synonyms tentative, interim.
- candid feedback / opinion / discussion; noun candor (US) / candour (UK); adverb candidly. Not the same as blunt, which suggests less care.
- tactful / tact / tactfully / tactless; diplomatic is the near synonym; have the tact to...
- Hedging chunks: it would appear that, it seems to me, to the best of my knowledge, as far as I can tell, in my experience.
Exercise¶
Cloze (use words from this week; earlier words as review).
- ___, the delay is due to the vendor, but we haven't confirmed it.
- The approval is ___; legal may still change the terms.
- She was ___ about the risks and did not soften the numbers.
- It was ___ of him to raise the issue privately.
- Users ___ report timeouts because of the misconfigured proxy, but we have not proven it yet.
- The report should ___ its claim with logs. (Week 1)
- We should ___ risk before we commit; then decide what to ___. (Week 1: two verbs)
- The team ___ the migration through two quarters. (Week 3: champion, past)
Answers and explanations
- Presumably / Conceivably (both fit: presumably = reasonable to suppose, conceivably = possible). 2. provisional. 3. candid. 4. tactful. 5. Conceivably (users could report...). Presumably would misfit because there is no presumed fact. 6. substantiate. 7. assess; mitigate. 8. championed.
Use it¶
Write three sentences: one with presumably, one with provisional, one describing a candid conversation. Say them aloud.
Day 3 — Speaking: Cutting filler words (um, like, you know)¶
⏱ 30 min · Wed
Prompt (60-90 seconds)¶
"Explain a technical trade-off you recently weighed: two options, your choice, and why. Aim for zero 'um', 'like', 'you know'."
Structure¶
Options -> Criteria -> Choice -> Risk. Speak slower by 10 percent.
Pronunciation micro-drill¶
- Why fillers appear: the brain is planning while the mouth keeps going. Replace them with a silent pause: silence sounds more confident than "um".
- Substitution ladder: um -> silent pause; like -> delete; you know -> delete or say "for example"; so... at the start of every sentence -> vary or drop; basically/actually -> use only when the meaning is needed.
- Bridge phrases buy thinking time without sounding lost: "Let me think about that." "The short answer is..." "There are two parts to that."
- Breath-based pacing: inhale at the end of a thought group; the pause is planning time.
- Drill: 60-second impromptu talks on random work topics (a design review, a deployment, an outage). Count fillers per minute (baseline in the recording, then aim to halve).
- Sound drill (linking): "an-API" (link the /n/), "check_it_out", "turn_it_off": linking makes speech smoother and reduces gaps where fillers creep in.
Self-check¶
- I counted my fillers per minute (target below 3).
- I replaced at least half of my fillers with silent pauses.
- I used one bridge phrase.
- I did not speed up to avoid fillers.
- I finished the thought before starting the next.
Day 4 — Idioms & phrasal verbs: Negotiation: meet halfway, off the table¶
⏱ 30 min · Thu
| Expression | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| meet (someone) halfway | compromise; each side gives something; neutral, common | We can't cut the scope by half, but we can meet you halfway with a phased delivery. |
| off the table | no longer available or open for discussion | Removing the audit requirement is off the table. |
| on the table | available or under discussion; neutral | The vendor has a discount on the table if we sign for three years. |
| sleep on it | delay a decision until the next day; informal | I'd like to sleep on it and get back to you tomorrow. |
| drive a hard bargain | negotiate firmly, giving little away; neutral to mildly admiring | The procurement team drove a hard bargain on the licensing fees. |
Note: the noun phrase on the table (an offer is available or being discussed) is understood everywhere. The verb to table is a trap: in British English it means to propose something for discussion, in American English to postpone it. Avoid the verb with a mixed audience.
Exercise¶
- "We can't give you six months, but we can ___ you ___ with four."
- "Once legal said no, that option was ___ the table."
- Which idiom means to postpone a decision overnight?
- "The vendor ___ a hard bargain."
- Rewrite: "Reducing the price of the contract is no longer possible."
- Rewrite idiomatically: "Let's compromise on the deadline."
- Which verb form of table is risky with a mixed US/UK audience, and why?
- Choose the best: "I don't want to decide now; can I ___?" (sleep on it / meet halfway / hard bargain)
Answers and explanations
- meet, halfway. 2. off. 3. sleep on it. 4. drives (drove). 5. "Reducing the price is off the table." 6. "Let's meet halfway on the deadline." 7. To table: British = propose for discussion, American = postpone. 8. sleep on it.
When NOT to use them
In a live negotiation with non-native speakers, prefer literal statements ("We can't move on price; we can adjust payment terms") for the key points. Off the table can sound like a hard closing move: use it only when you mean it.
Day 5 — Writing: Editing for concision: cut 30 percent¶
⏱ 30 min · Fri
Techniques: delete "throat-clearing" (I would like to take this opportunity to); replace weak verb + noun with a verb (make a decision -> decide); cut doubled words (each and every); remove very/really/quite; turn passive to active when it saves words; merge sentences that repeat.
Bad draft (96 words)¶
I just wanted to reach out to you in order to let you know that, as a result of the fact that the deployment did not go as well as we had hoped, we have made the decision to postpone the release that was originally planned for Tuesday until such time as we are able to carry out a full and thorough investigation of what the root cause of the issue actually was. Please be advised that we will provide you with a further update at some point in the near future once we have more information available to us.
Task¶
Cut to 65 words or fewer without losing information, and add a concrete time for the next update.
Model answer and what changed
Because Tuesday's deployment failed, we are postponing the release until we find the root cause. I will send an update by 3 p.m. Wednesday.
(25 words; you may keep a slightly fuller version up to 65.)
- "I just wanted to reach out to let you know that" deleted (throat-clearing).
- "as a result of the fact that" -> "because".
- "made the decision to postpone" -> "are postponing" (weak verb + noun to strong verb).
- "full and thorough" -> removed the doubled adjective; "carry out an investigation" -> "find the root cause".
- "at some point in the near future" replaced by a specific time (precision, not just brevity).
Day 6 — Speaking record: Cutting filler words (2-minute recording)¶
⏱ 30 min · Sat
Task¶
Record 2 minutes without notes. Prompt: "Argue for or against adopting a new technology at your company (for example, a managed event-streaming service). Give two reasons and one risk." Count fillers per minute.
Structure¶
Position (15 s) -> Reason 1 (30 s) -> Reason 2 (30 s) -> Risk and mitigation (25 s) -> Recommendation (20 s).
Scoring rubric (1-4)¶
| Criterion | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity | hard to follow | main idea recoverable | clear | effortless |
| Structure | no order | partial | clear start and end | signposted |
| Fluency | more than 8 fillers/min | 4-8 fillers/min | 1-3 per min | almost none, pauses used well |
| Grammar accuracy | blocks meaning | frequent errors | occasional | rare |
| Vocabulary range | basic | some variety | good | precise, varied |
| Pronunciation | unintelligible in places | needs effort | mostly clear | clear stress and rhythm |
Shadowing task¶
Shadow 90 seconds of a fluent, unhurried speaker (a TED talk at ted.com or a BBC Learning English episode, bbc.co.uk/learningenglish). Copy where the speaker pauses rather than fills.
Log your score: date, total /24, fillers per minute (compare with Day 3 and Week 0).
Day 7 — Soft skills + weekly review: Disagreeing respectfully¶
⏱ 30 min · Sun
Scenario¶
In a planning meeting, the head of engineering, Tomás, proposes rewriting the pricing service in a new language in six months. You believe the plan underestimates the risk, and you have seen the last rewrite miss its deadline by four months. Several people are nodding.
Task¶
Write about 150 words (or script) of what you say. Include: acknowledging the goal, one specific concern with evidence, a hedged suggestion or question, and an offer to work on an alternative.
Model response and techniques
"Tomás, I agree with the goal: the current service is hard to change, and that costs us every quarter. I do have a concern about the six-month timeline. The last rewrite of the rating engine took ten months against a plan of six, and this service has more integrations. It seems likely we would hit similar surprises.
Would it be worth de-risking this by rewriting one module first and measuring the effort? If that goes to plan, we could commit to the full timeline with more confidence. I'd be happy to draft that pilot with you this week."
Techniques: agree with the goal, disagree with the method; evidence rather than opinion; hedges once ("it seems likely", "would it be worth"); a constructive alternative; collaborative close.
Weekly recap (20 items)¶
- Complete: "If we ___ (have) more time, we would test more." 2. Correct: "If I would know..." 3. Third conditional form? 4. Which is more polite: "Can you" or "Could you"? 5. Strongest certainty: should / might? 6. Correct: "Would you mind to help?" 7. Why avoid over-hedging? 8. Meaning of presumably. 9. Provisional means? 10. Candid vs blunt. 11. Noun of tactful. 12. Conceivably: certainty level? 13. Meet halfway meaning. 14. Off the table meaning. 15. Sleep on it. 16. Drive a hard bargain. 17. One way to cut a weak verb + noun. 18. Why replace "in the near future" with a date? 19. What replaces "um"? 20. Disagree with what: goal or method?
Answers
- had. 2. "If I knew..." 3. if + past perfect, would have + participle. 4. Could you. 5. should. 6. "Would you mind helping?" 7. Sounds unsure and vague. 8. Reasonably supposed, unconfirmed. 9. Arranged for now, may change. 10. Candid is honest with care; blunt is direct with less care. 11. tact. 12. Low: possible. 13. Compromise. 14. No longer available. 15. Delay a decision overnight. 16. Negotiate firmly. 17. Replace make a decision with decide. 18. Precision and accountability. 19. A silent pause. 20. Method (or evidence), while agreeing on the goal.
Self-score¶
- I fixed at least 8 of 10 Day 1 items.
- I used presumably/provisional/candid correctly in speech.
- My filler rate fell compared with Week 0.
- My edited draft was at least 30 percent shorter.
- I disagreed with a colleague this week using evidence and a hedge.
Error log: write your top 3 recurring mistakes. This is also the input to the comm-1 checkpoint.